Відео

Bir gün aynı çatının altında görüşmek dileğiyle.

According to the Quran, only the Torah and the Evangel are considered divine revelations, while other texts are viewed as human creations. Yet the Torah was originally revealed in the Arabic tongue: { And before it was the Book of Moses as a guide and a mercy. And this is a 👉confirming Book👈 👉in the Arabic tongue👈 to warn those who have wronged and as good tidings to the doers of good. } [Al-Ahqaf: 12] { Among those who are Jews, who they 👉distort words from their places👈 and say, "We hear and disobey" and "Hear but be not heard" and "Raina" 👉twisting their tongues👈 and defaming the religion. [An-Nisa: 46] { And indeed, there is among them a party who 👉alter the Scripture with their tongues 👈 so you may think it is from the Scripture, but it is not from the Scripture. And they say, "This is from Allah," but it is not from Allah. And they speak untruth about Allah while they know. } [Aal-Imran: 78] 🟥 Firstly, Arabic in the Torah: 1. The name of the king of "FLSTIN" in the Torah, Abi-Melek, is consistent with Arabic nomenclature, suggesting Arabic linguistic influence. "Abi-Melek" can be translated as "Father of owner/king" where "Abi" (ابي) means "father of" or "my father", and "Melek" (ملك) means "king" or "owner". 2. Arabic loanwords in the Torah: Many words in the original text of the Torah are identified as Arabic loanwords in Strong's concordance, suggesting a linguistic connection to the Arabic language. 3. Phonetic similarities: The original text of the Torah contains many words that match Arabic pronunciation, despite the complex morphological structure of verbs with pronouns indicating the subject or object, nouns with possessive pronouns, demonstrative pronouns, prepositions, etc. The composition and construction of the sentences are consistent with Arabic in many aspects, such as morphology, semantics, orthography, grammar, and syntax. Example: Genesis 16:6 (Consonants only) - בידך "b-y-ḏ-ḵ" Arabic equivalent: - بيدك "b-y-d-k" In the original text, "בידך" (b-y-ḏ-ḵ) is a compound of the following word classes: - Preposition (ב, b) meaning "in". - Noun (יד, y-ḏ) meaning "hand". - Pronoun (ך, ḵ) meaning "your". Together, they make up the phrase "in your hand". 4. By analyzing the Hebrew text where the word "Flstin" is mentioned and comparing it with the corresponding Arabic text, it becomes clear that words and sentence structures align with Arabic linguistics on several levels. Example: Genesis 16:6 (Consonants only) - בארץ "b-e-r-ṣ" - פלשתים "ph-l-š-t-î-m" Arabic equivalent: - بارض "b-e-r-ḍ" - فلسطين "f-l-s-ṭ-ī-n" - The correct translation should be 'In the land of Flstin,' meaning inside the territory of Flstin, not 'in the land of the Philistines.' The transliteration of the Arabic name for Palestine 'فلسطين' is 'F-L-S-Ṭ-I-N.' - While the suffix "-im" in Hebrew commonly indicates plurality, in the case of "פלשתים" (Plishtim), it is more logical to interpret it as part of the original name of the land, similar to how "فلسطين" (Filistin) is used in Arabic. The absence of the definite article "ה" (ha-) further supports this interpretation, indicating that "פלשתים" (Plishtim) is a proper noun referring to the land itself rather than a term for its inhabitants. This interpretation aligns with the historical and linguistic evidence, suggesting that "פלשתים" (Plishtim) (فلسطين) refers to the land known today as Palestine. - The first mention of "Flstin" in Torah is as proper noun referring to a person. According to Genesis 10:6-14: 👉 "Flstin" is descended from Casluhim, who is a son of Mitzraim 👉(Egypt), who is a son of Ham, Noah's son. 🟥🟥 Secondly, Arabic at the time of Jesus: The phrase spoken on the cross, recorded in Matthew 27:46 and Mark 15:34 as "Eli, Eli, lema sabachthani?" translates to "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" - "Eli" corresponds to "الهي" (Elahi) in Arabic, meaning "my God." - "Lema" corresponds to Arabic "لِمَ" (lema), meaning "why." - "Sabachthani" bears similarities to "Nabathtani" in Arabic, which means "abandoned." These linguistic similarities support the hypothesis that the statement was uttered in Arabic, showing significant parallels in style, semantics, syntax, morphology, and orthography. Additionally, the spectators' mistaken interpretation of the phrase as a prayer to "Elijah" instead of "Elahi" highlights the challenges of accurate interpretation. Another related verb appears in Psalm 22:1, "עזבתני" ('ă-zaḇ-tā-nî), which should be translated as "tortured me" rather than "abandoned me." This verb is linguistically equivalent to the Arabic verb "عذبتني" (a-za-b-ta-n-i), which carries the same connotation of suffering or torture. 👉👉 This linguistic evidence strongly supports the claim that the statement was uttered in Arabic and that Arabic was also present in Jesus' time.

There are millions of these perverts in the U.S. right now!!!!!

THIS MUST, MUST, MUST STOP NOW!!!!!!!!!!

WELL IN 2024 IT IS NOT BETTER!!!!

Watch that UA-cam link that tells you the origin of Arabs

ua-cam.com/video/Sj0R3WBv76U/v-deo.htmlsi=h0qgpWvMEAlz01F8

Thank you Dr. Little. Great work. What bothers me most about those so called ‘academics’ is how they dismiss and disregard the traditional muslim view and accept with total trust and undeserved confidence in anything that Christians wrote about Islam and Muslims. Some people even believe that the prophet Muhammad lead an invasion of Jerusalem.

these arguments live and breathe - i just convinced a narrow-minded polemicist against this theory using this video.

Greetings from Azerbaijan to my fellow turkic brothers !

Assalamu 'alaykum brother. Very interesting topic, thanks for sharing. However I'm a little confused about the intro. Who said that Q2:240 was abrogated? Was it Adnan Ibrahim and then he changed his mind or am I getting it wrong??

Fantastic discussion. I knew very little about the Mughal Empire & this helped alot toward organizing its history in my mind for further explorations.

𐰋𐰃𐰼 𐱃𐰣𐰼𐰢 𐱅𐰇𐰼𐰜𐰏 𐰚𐰇𐰔𐰓

Superb work. Well done. I hope for more.

Upvoted for clear presentation, and for epic lecture body language.

Today we know better about Huns, Western Huns or Eastern Huns were Turkic.

Amazing lecture. Definitely need to connect with some Ibadis in the future. 😊

The complete genealogy of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ: *PROPHET AHMAD/MUHAMMAD ﷺ* son of Abdullah son of *ABDULMUTALIB(SHAYBAT AL-HAMD)* son of *HASHIM(AMR)* son of Abdumanaf(Al-Mugheera) son of Qussay(Zaid) son of Kilab son of Murrah son of Ka'ab son of Lu'ay son of Ghalib son of *FIHR/SAHR(QURAYSH)* son of Malek son of An-Nadhr(Qayss) son of *KENANA* son of Khuzayma son of Mudareka(Amer) son of Elias son of Mudhar son of Nezar son of Ma'ad son of *ADNAN²¹* son of Addu/Udd son of Hemiasa'a son of Salaman(Hemiada'a/As-Shahib) son of A'auss(Mundjir/Nabit) son of Boz/Bawz(Tha'alaba) son of Qamwal(Yoz/Yawz/A'ashr Al-Ghina) son of Ubayy(Sa'ad Radjab) son of A'awwam(Qamwal/Reeh An-Nassib) son of Nashid(Muhallam/Dhul-A'ayn) son of Hazza(Al-A'awwam) son of Bildas(Al-Muhtamil) son of Yidlaf/Tidlaf(Raima) son of Tabikh/Tanidj(Tahib/Al-A'aiqan) son of Jahim(A'ailla) son of Nahish(A'ailla) son of Makhiy(Ad-Dhareeb Khatim An-Nar) son of A'aidh/A'aify(A'aafa/A'abqar Abul-Djinn) son of A'abqar(Ibrahim Djami'i As-Shaml) son of Ubbayd(Isma'il Dhul-Matabikh) son of Ad-Da'a(Yazan At-Ta'an) son of Hamdan(Isma'il Dhul-Al-A'awadj) son of Sanbar(Bashmin/Al-Muti'im Fil-Mahal) son of Yathrabi(Yathrem/At-Tamh) son of Yahzen(Nahzen/Al-Qasswar) son of Yalhan(A'anoud) son of Aruai'i/Ara'aua(Ad-Da'ada'a) son of A'aidh/A'aidhy(A'aqer) son of Daishan/Waishan(Az-Za'aia) son of A'aissar(A'assir An-Naydawan Dhul-Andiya) son of Afnad/Aqnad(Qannad/Ayama) son of Aiham/Abham(Yahami/Dawss Al-A'atq/Ajmal Al-Khalq) son of Muqsar/Muqsa(Muqasri/Hissn Nizal) son of Naheth son of Zareh(Qumayr) son of Samiy/Shama(Sama/Al-Muhshir) son of Maziy/Maza(Hurmuz) son of A'audha/A'auss(At-Thamr/As-Safiy) son of A'aram son of *KEDAR⁶⁰ SON OF PROPHET ISMA'IL/ISHMAEL ﷺ SON OF PROPHET IBRAHIM/ABRAHAM ﷺ* son of Azar/Terah⁶³ son of [Nahor son of Serug son of Roog/Reu son of Peleg son of *PROPHET EBER/HUD ﷺ* son of Shelah son of Cainan son of Arphaxad son of Shem/Sam son of *PROPHET NOAH/NUH ﷺ* son of Lamech son of Methuselah son of *PROPHET ENOCH/IDRISS ﷺ* son of Jared/Arad son of Mahalalel/Mehalael son of Kenan son of Enosh son of *PROPHET SETH/SHEITH ﷺ* son of *PROPHET ADAM⁸¹ ﷺ* ] Atleast +81 Generations (In the context of Pre-Azar/Terah genealogy, The Hebrew "son" may mean "descendant" or "successor" or "nation" i.e not necessarily have to be directly linked generations) Sources: - "Rahmatan Lil-Alamin", Muhammad Sulaiman Al-Mansurburi, from p.269 to p.316 (ar ver) 2/11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 52 - "The Sealed Nectar", Safiyy Ar-Rahman Al-Mubarakfuri, from p.48 to p.53 (ar ver) - Ibn Hisham, 1/1, 2 & 1/2, 3, 4 - "Talqih Fuhom Ahl Al-Athar", Abderrahman Bin Ali Al-Jawzi, p.5 & p.6 (ar ver) - "Khulassat As-Siyar", At-Tabari, p.6 (ar ver) - "Tarikh At-Tabari", vol.2, p.193 (ar ver) - "Attabaqat", Ibn-Sa'ad narration - Qur'an 6:74 - Sahih Muslim 2276 - Sahih al-Bukhari 3491 & 3492 - Book of Genesis 5:3-32 & Genesis 10:21-32 & Genesis 11:10-32 - 1 Chronicles 1:1-31 - The Apocalypse of Abraham

fascinating

They care more about the immorality of breaking confidentiality, than of not reporting a repeat sex offender of children? This is disgusting

Him not being charged says nothing

The things done in the name of “science”. I’m disgusted. Bad people can be scientists too

According to Genesis 17:3-20, God promises to establish His covenant with ALL of Abraham’s “seed” (‘zera’ in Hebrew) without exception. The phrase אב המון (av hamon) literally means “father of a multitude” and the gematria of this phrase is 208, the same as that of both הגר "Hagar" & יצחק "Yitzhaq", lit. name of Isaac. It also proves the genealogy of the prophet Muhammad ﷺ through his great grandmother, Salma binti Amr, the daughter of Exilarch, the Resh Geluta, the house of King David. Obviously, the prophet is really the son of Isaac too through the prophet’s great grandmother, Salma binti Amr, the wife of Hashim bin Abd Manaf. Al-Mutthalib bin Abd Manaf himself had children from a Jewish woman of the people of Khaybar - wulida min Ahl Khaybar (Ibn Habib’s kitab al-Munammaq). He married this woman, namely Asma’ binti Abdullah. Hashim married Salma binti Amr an-Najjar clans, the noble woman, and this marriage became by far his most important one since Salma gave birth to Abd al-Mutthalib(Shaybat Al-Hamd), the grandfather of the prophet Muhammad Source: Michael Lecker. A Note on Early Marriage Links between Quraishis and Jewish Women. Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam. JSAI 10 (Jerusalem: the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1987), pp. 24-29.

Takes balls to leave what your community pushes. Truth is truth

You Will never find something like that … and the « alliance » was not with « him » 😵‍💫

Solomon' temple : ua-cam.com/video/dxsS7aMEXec/v-deo.htmlsi=iE7r7zajonDWg3KT

Great job everyone, this is a very nice deep dive.

One of the greatest minds of all time!

Is this channel run by academics ?? Who is running it ?

This video is full of falsehoods. Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Tuvan, etc. are all missing. Moreover, Uralian (more so Uralic) languages are not Turkic.

Oğuz türkü olmaktan şeref duyarım yaşasın türk milleti

I watched 11 minutes and had enough. Unfortunately, the Master says genealogies in the Qur’an, even though the Qur’an does not talk about genealogies at all. It is like a book of guidance for all people. He addressed his call: O sons of Adam, O sons of Israel, O mankind. We have not found anything in the Qur’an that details genealogies for us, and it seems to me that the Master in the video is influenced by the Holy Bible. Who cared a lot about providing a historical record of the family of the grandfather, the father, the grandson, the grandson’s son, the grandson’s son, etc. This man married such-and-such a lady and gave birth to how many sons and daughters, and many, very many details about the families and their lineages, but the Qur’an did not care about that at all. It directs its speech to the world, to all human beings, not to his family. I hope that It is clear that the word “Bani Israel” does not mean who are the children of a man named Israel, but rather it means “Bani Israel” = those who walk in the direction of God = those seeking the path of God, those who walk toward God in the darkness of the night and in the light of day, and under all circumstances and pressures, they are heading to God. The Qur’an has directed its call, O sons of Adam, for all people have one origin. One, so why do you differ? Why do you not agree? Why do you fight and struggle? Your origin is one, the first Adam (Adam is not a person, he is not a man, but Adam here is a group of barbaric humans who were placed in a reserve to be educated and genetically modified to be ready for the iron mission of succession to the earth, its reconstruction, reform, and continuation. Adam is a stage of Stages of development of the human race) Also, O man and people, it is a call to all people to every human being. Do not be biased toward a gender, race, or family. You are a human being like all the rest. There is no room for racism and allegations of the superiority of one gender over another. There is no opportunity to oppress a human being, a nation, or a people. You are all equal.

Hogwash. IS MAN, then, not aware that it is We who create him out of a [mere] drop of sperm - whereupon, lo! he shows himself endowed with the power to think and to argue And [now] he [argues about Us, and] thinks of Us in terms of comparison, and is oblivious of how he himself was created! [And so] he says, “Who could give life to bones that have crumbled to dust?” Say: “He who brought them into being in the first instance will give them life [once again], seeing that He has full knowledge of every act of creation. Quran 36 Is that metaphorical too? Repent, man, from your denial of the truth.

I think one of the best ways to think of Mohammed is a diplomat? Another way is to think of him as a dealer. The histories suggest he was a very capable trader? He had very competent persuasion skills. I think he might have used his negotiation skills with the Quraysh. And this is where the 'Satanic Verses' comes in. It is an example of Mohammed doing a 'deal' in order to gain support with the Quraysh. Obviously, that was a complex deal. So this is why all the prior ritual tropes were accommodated by Islam. It is almost as if Mohammed is going, fine, so long as you believe in one God, we can have stone-worship and circumambulation ...... Again, in order to bring onboard the Arabian tribes .....

Since battle of Talas, the captivated Chinese artisans spread their papermaking technology to the Arab world.

As far as I understand, Tabari DID NOT have the original letters with him. The letters were lost and he wrote down what was orally transmitted from Urwah's son, Hisham. Particularly through five chains: From Abdulwarith bin Abdulsamad, from his father, from Aban bin Yazid Al-Attar, from Hisham bin Urwah, from Urwah ibn Al-Zubayr. Please keep in mind that Tabari and Urwah lived 213 years apart. So where did Prof. Joel Hayward get this information that Tabari had Urwah's letters with him?

Another great episode as always

Another great interview! And perfect timing, recently I've been thinking a lot about the relevance of ishmaelite genealogy, and how it was understood internally/externally.

I always understood the folk idea of southern Arabians being the "real arabs" coming from medieval Islamic scholars as being more related to ethnicity rather than language, as in the Arabs recognized the south Arabians as natives to Arabia and viewed them to be of purer Arabian stock, recognizing themselves as later arrivals with a closer connection to the Semites in the North

Islam is Messianic cult

🔴 Dr. Kensey was a dirty mentally ill pervert that put out a total hoax report on sexuality because the people he interviewed were not normal people. They were drug addicts, prostitutes, criminals and homosexuals.

Didn’t John of Damascus call Muslims “Saracens” and Muhammad a “false prophet”? The biggest earliest critique of Islam is John of Damascus or St. John of Damascus, also called Saint John Damascene, Latin Johannes Damascenus. He was born c. 675, Damascus and died December 4, 749, near Jerusalem (Eastern and Western feast day December 4). He spent his early adult life a few decades after the prophet’s death. John of Damascus was born around 40 years after Muhammad’s death, providing him with a unique perspective on the early Islamic community. He lived during the rule of Abdul Malik bin Marwan and perhaps witnessed the construction of the Dome of the Rock. In his book The Fountain of Wisdom, in the second part titled Concerning Heresy (Perì eréseon), the last chapter of this part (Chapter 101) deals with the Heresy of the Ishmaelites. He explicitly wrote about Muhammad and Islam as follows: “There is also the superstition of the Ishmaelites which to this day prevails and keeps people in error, being a forerunner of the Antichrist. They are descended from Ishmael, [who] was born to Abraham of Agar, and for this reason, they are called both Agarenes and Ishmaelites. They are also called Saracens, which is derived from Sarras kenoi, or destitute of Sara, because of what Agar said to the angel: ‘Sara hath sent me away destitute.’ These used to be idolaters and worshiped the morning star and Aphrodite, whom in their own language they called Khabár, which means great. And so down to the time of Heraclius, they were very great idolaters. From that time to the present, a false prophet named Mohammed has appeared in their midst. This man, after having chanced upon the Old and New Testaments and likewise, it seems, having conversed with an Arian monk, devised his own heresy. Then, having insinuated himself into the good graces of the people by a show of seeming piety, he gave out that a certain book had been sent down to him from heaven. He had set down some ridiculous compositions in this book of his and he gave it to them as an object of veneration.” orthodoxinfo.com/general/stjohn_islam.aspx On the Catholic Encyclopedia, you can find a short paragraph about John of Damascus concerning Islam and Muhammad: “The second part, Concerning Heresy, is little more than a copy of a similar work by Epiphanius, brought up to date by John Damascene. The author indeed expressly disclaims originality except in the chapters devoted to Islamism, Iconoclasm, and Aposchitae. To the list of eighty heresies that constitute the Panarion of Epiphanius, he added twenty heresies that had sprung up since his time. In treating Islamism, he vigorously assails the immoral practices of Mohammed and the corrupt teachings inserted in the Koran to legalize the delinquencies of the prophet.” Conclusion In his book The Fountain of Wisdom, St. John of Damascus called Muslims “Saracens”, “Ishmaelites” and “Agarenes”, although the “Saracens” designation might have been used earlier. All these names were pejorative. He lived during Abdul Malik bin Marwan’s rule and perhaps witnessed the construction of the Dome of the Rock, very likely seeing the inscriptions of Muhammad’s name on the Dome of the Rock ambulatory. St. John of Damascus specifically called Muhammad by name six times: 1. “From that time (the reign of Heraclius) to the present a false prophet named Mohammed has appeared in their midst.” 2. “As has been related, this Mohammed wrote many ridiculous books, to each one of which he set a title.” 3. “Mohammed had a friend named Zeid.” 4. “This man had a beautiful wife with whom Mohammed fell in love.” 5. “Once, when they were sitting together, Mohammed said: ‘Oh, by the way…’” 6. “Mohammed says that the Christ asked God for a table and that it was given Him.” It is really funny to see Christian polemicist UA-camrs deceiving millions of Christians into believing in their theory that Mohammad didn’t exist. And this video lasts 3:43:47 hours to disprove that Mohammad didn’t exist … hahaha. So folks, Mohammad did exist.

Thanks a lot !!! Roxana, thank you for raising the question about the Jewish presence in Mecca and Medina! 🌹🌹🌹

There is no Arabic or Persian influence in the grammar of Turkish actually. Ottoman Turkish had that kind of influence but it was not a real language. It was kind of a high language, people never spoke it.

This gentleman is the definitive poster child for the saying, “common sense is not that common”

8:28 armor looks very much like that of Goguryeo. Plus, the hat with two feather jutting out is a trade mark of Goguryeo called 조우관(鳥羽冠), so I could not help but notice.

This is a topic somewhat close to my current area of research into Saffron. Gaon referred to the heifer as yellow, which is from the Semitic word for Saffron. I can't draw out all of the philology here, but there is a hidden layer to the Hebrew and Syriac texts that can be revealed through close intertextual analysis of roots relating to the Apocalypse, rolling things, wheels, etc., which all end up as having some connotation with the crocus. Ezekiel ate a roll of Saffron, for example, not the roll of a book. I could go on and on, but it does seem to connect philologically to the name Lazarus through ezer. I'll have to put it all forth in the book for you, but it's the "Sign of Jonah," the "Seal of Solomon," the Vesica Piscis/Mandorla, and the central symbol of the pillar capital orders of the first and second temples. Apocalypse.

I thought the cow concept was that when someone was found dead in an area, the tribe closest to the dead body would sacrifice a cow and share its meat. This act served to make amends, symbolizing that their hands were clean from the act. It was a way of saying they did not commit the crime while also honoring the dead by sacrificing meat and sharing it with those who were distressed.

Excellent talk. Love andalusia